Full Paper
Abstract
If you only want to share and discuss your latest research with others at the conference, you can submit an abstract for poster or oral presentation. Authors must submit a 300-word abstract. Submission should clearly describe a technical problem, outline a solution, and provide some results. The abstract submission deadline is the same as the regular paper submission deadline. Acceptance or rejection will be notified within two weeks.
Microsoft Word Template Latex Templete Click to Submit
Important Dates
Ethics
It is not appropriate to submit papers that are identical (or substantially similar) to versions that have been previously published, accepted for publication, or submitted in parallel to other conferences or journals. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy, and the organizers have the right to reject such submissions, or to remove them from the proceedings. Note that submissions that have been or are being presented at workshops do not violate the dual-submission policy, as long as there’s no associated archival publication.
AAIML defines plagiarism as the reuse of someone else's prior processes, results, or words without explicitly acknowledging the original author and source. It is important for all authors to recognize that plagiarism in any form, at any level, is unacceptable and is considered a serious breach of professional conduct, with potentially severe ethical and legal consequences.
Review
All submissions must be anonymized and may not contain any information with the intention or consequence of violating the double-blind reviewing policy, including (but not limited to) citing previous works of the authors or sharing links in a way that can infer any author’s identity or institution, actions that reveal the identities of the authors to potential reviewers.
Accepted papers must be based on original research and must contain novel results of significant interest to the machine learning community. Results can be either theoretical or empirical. Results will be judged on the degree to which they have been objectively established and/or their potential for scientific and technological impact. Reproducibility of results and easy availability of code will be taken into account in the decision-making process whenever appropriate. To put concisely: The reviewers needs to help select papers that provide new ideas that others can both understand and benefit from. To that effect, we ask you to review papers on six (6) basic criteria: 1. Relevance to conference; 2. Originality; Clarity/Quality of English; 3. References; 4. Length of Paper; 5. Potential Value; 6. Comments & Feedback.